Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. EQUOS- Business management suite
  3. Bin scoring

Bin scoring

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved EQUOS- Business management suite
1 Posts 1 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jai.reddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Bin Scoring System for Warehouse Module

    A “Bin scoring” system is a feedback loop that learns from every stock movement, giving each bin a score profile based on how well it has historically suited certain SKUs, volumes, or operational patterns. This provides a way to suggest bins in the future that better match real-world usage rather than static rules.


    1. Core Idea

    Every time stock is put into or moved out of a bin, you accumulate signals about how suitable that bin was. Over time, those signals form a score that can be used to recommend bins for new stock.


    2. Dimensions to Score

    You don’t want just one “global score,” but a combination of weighted metrics:

    • SKU Affinity

      • Does this bin commonly store this SKU (or related SKUs, e.g. same category)?
      • Accumulate a higher score if the SKU stays without problems (no overflow, no forced moves).
      • Penalize if stock is quickly moved out again (wrong placement).
    • Utilization & Fit

      • Track how full the bin is when this SKU is placed.
      • If the bin consistently holds “just right” quantities, give it positive points.
      • If it overflows or sits half-empty, deduct points.
    • Movement Efficiency

      • How easy was it to pick from this bin (short walking distance, ergonomic position)?
      • If warehouse operators move stock in/out smoothly, add points.
      • If items are frequently reallocated, subtract.
    • Stability / Retention

      • If stock remains in a bin until consumption/dispatch without mid-cycle moves, reward it.
      • Penalize bins where items are frequently relocated before use.
    • Task Correlation

      • Track whether the bin’s contents aligned with outbound demand (e.g., fast-moving SKUs near dispatch lanes score better).
      • Bins that are used repeatedly for similar tasks gain affinity.

    3. Accumulator Mechanics

    Think of this like a ledger of events that updates a scorecard per bin (and optionally per SKU-bin pair):

    • On Stock Inbound (putaway)

      • Increase bin_sku_score[bin][sku] by +N (baseline “fit” attempt).
    • On Stock Outbound (pick/ship)

      • Add +1 to the bin’s pick_success score.
    • On Forced Move (relocation due to bad fit/overflow)

      • Deduct points (e.g., -5).
    • On Repeated Usage (same SKU returns to same bin)

      • Add bonus multiplier for “stickiness.”
    • On Inactivity (bin holds stock but never used for long period)

      • Apply decay (reduce score slowly over time).

    This produces an evolving score matrix:

    bin_sku_score[bin][sku] = weighted sum of (putaway events, picks, forced moves, stability, etc.)
    bin_score[bin] = aggregate across all SKUs
    

    4. Suggestion Logic

    When suggesting a bin for a new SKU inbound:

    1. Filter by eligible bins (size, temperature, zone).
    2. Rank by bin_sku_score[bin][sku] (highest first).
    3. If no history for that SKU, fall back to:
      • bin_score[bin] (general suitability)
      • Or similarity (e.g., bins with same SKU category).

    5. Long-Term Benefits

    • Creates self-learning warehouse flow – bins get better over time.
    • Reduces human decision fatigue (“where do I put this?”).
    • Can be tuned by adjusting weights:
      • e.g., prioritize picking efficiency vs space utilization.
    • Supports future automation (ML model can replace rule weights).
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups